Why Tapir is Different?
The Problem with Existing DeFi Protection
Most DeFi protection models share the same fundamental flaw: they force capital to sit idle. Protection sellers lock collateral in pools that earn nothing, while protection buyers pay premiums that eat into their yield. The result is a system where protecting your position means sacrificing the very returns you're trying to protect.
Tapir takes a different approach entirely.
Tapir vs. Traditional DeFi Protection
Capital Efficiency
Collateral sits idle in pools
100% productive — both sides earn full base yield
Coverage Scope
Typically smart contract exploits only
Any depeg event — hacks, slashing, market dislocations
Claims Process
Manual filing, governance votes, days-to-weeks resolution
Automated at pool expiry via on-chain oracles
Protection Buyers
Pay premiums, receive no yield on coverage capital
Keep full base yield; cost is only the market-determined DP/YB spread
Protection Sellers
Lock capital for a fixed premium
Earn base yield + premium on the same capital
Better Economics for Both Sides
For protection buyers (DP holders): You keep the full base yield of the underlying asset. The only cost is the market-determined spread between DP and the underlying — typically a fraction of what traditional premium-based models charge.
For protection sellers (YB holders): You earn the same base yield as DP holders, plus an additional premium for absorbing first-loss exposure. Your capital is never locked idle — it works for you while you underwrite risk.
Built for High-Yield Assets
Most protection models cannot economically cover high-yield assets (15%+ APY). The reason is straightforward: if protection sellers must match the yield plus a risk premium on idle capital, the cost becomes prohibitive.
Tapir solves this because neither side gives up the base yield. Protection remains affordable even on assets generating 20%+ APY — precisely the assets that need it most.
Simplified Risk Model
With traditional yield strategies, users take on compounding layers of risk. Consider a position in a yield aggregator built on top of a restaking protocol, accessed through a DEX: that's three or more sets of smart contracts, each with its own exploit surface.
Tapir collapses this. Users interact with Tapir's contracts only. Due diligence is done once against a minimal codebase, not repeated for every new high-yield protocol that launches.
Due Diligence
Separate DD required for each protocol in the stack
DD done once against Tapir's contracts
Risk Surface
Compounds across every protocol layer (restaking, DEX, aggregator)
Limited to Tapir's own contracts
Loss Exposure
Holder bears all losses and profit reductions
DP holders are protected; YB holders accept risk for enhanced yield
Transparent, Trustless Resolution
Tapir's settlement process removes human discretion entirely.
Price Tracking
Multiple trusted price sources track a high watermark price throughout the protection period
Depeg Detection
At pool expiry, the contract compares the final price against the high watermark to determine if a depeg occurred
Settlement
Anyone can trigger the settlement function — payouts are calculated deterministically from on-chain data
Auditability
All inputs, calculations, and payouts live on-chain and are fully verifiable
No governance votes. No manual interventions. No waiting.
Last updated